| HOME | Forums | Albums | POLLS | FAQ | Calendar | Arcade |
| | |||||||
| Gupp Deeng Gupps & Deengs only - Gapp maaro deeng haanko! |
|
This is a discussion on NASA's Greatest FAKE within the Gupp Deeng forums, part of the Chit-Chat category; I am taking this further to a previously discussed thread, because I want fresh opinion from fresh people: MAN LANDS ...
View Poll Results: NASA Faked the Moon Landing... | |||
| Yes | | 2 | 15.38% |
| No | | 6 | 46.15% |
| Can't Say | | 5 | 38.46% |
| What is NASA? | | 0 | 0% |
| Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Pyaar baant te chalo... | NASA's Greatest FAKE I am taking this further to a previously discussed thread, because I want fresh opinion from fresh people: MAN LANDS ON MOON WAS A BIG FAKE - THE GREATEST of the 20th CENTURY Actually, it's a BIG FAKE!!! Here are the facts: 1. As per policies, NASA does not leak out any research related data to the public. It is Secret Information. 2. When they talk of having landed on moon, at that time, they didn't have technology for even sending a dog into space, let alone people to the moon 3. Even today, 40 years after the FAKE, they can't send men up in the earth's orbit peoperly. Remember how we lost Kalpana Chawla, the team could not be brought back even from earth's orbit, let alone talking about moon. 4. Recent discovery mission also had sent men in the earth's orbit, but they don't have technology to send them further, say moon, mars, or other planets. They just don't have the technology for that! 5. The US Government is part of NASA in this BIG fraud. At the time they claim they sent men to moon, they did not simply have the means, but did have enough resources and means to FAKE it in the ANIMATION Laboratory. Your Comments? Krit | |
| | | |
| Advertisements | |
Advertisement | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: devil's heart Age: 52
Posts: 8,873
Thanks: 90
Thanked 97 Times in 55 Posts
Rep Power: 295 | NASA owes it to the citizens from whom it asks support, to be frank, honest and informative. And so that these citizens can make the wisest decisions for the use of their limited resources for a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations-for nature cannot be fooled. | |
| | | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Pyaar baant te chalo... | Re: NASA's Greatest FAKE hadd ho gayi... mere enne interesting thread nu edda khu'ch sitteya hoeya ee :< GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR Chalo hun saare mann jao ke eh sab chooth see.... Jera nahi mannda, usdee te $$%*##@*&%$% kar deni aa :< GRRRRRRRRRR | |
| | | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| . Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,964
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 191 | Re: NASA's Greatest FAKE There have always been doubts about the NASA's claim of whether or not Man landed on the MOON. This theory now widely known as conspiracy theory gained wide support around the world when on February 15th 2001 (and replayed on March 19), the Fox TV network aired a program called "Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?'' I've saw that TV program and have read about it a lot since. My personal opinion is that Man did no land on the MOON in 1969. Anyway, it is interesting to read arguements from both sides..! Here are arguements from both sides. See/read and decide for yourself: 1) It was a hoax: Ths first site actually sells a video that explains how and why it was impossible for MAN to have travelled to the Moon and back. http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm The whole video is not availble, but you can see a clip of the video which itself is quite interesting. Also see Director's Interview and read Director's Commentary and explore other links. This video claims: The Space Shuttle, so far, has killed fourteen people, merely trying to attain an orbit about two hundred fifty miles above the Earth. How is it then, that a third of a century ago, with less computing power in the entire rocket than in a present day twenty dollar Wal-Mart watch, NASA claims to have gone 100,000% farther, six different times between 1969 and 1972, landing on another celestial body and then returning, without ever killing anyone? How could they have powered air conditioning in two hundred fifty degree heat for three days with batteries? 2) NASA's explanation: This is from NASA's site. I haven't gone through the all the argument they've given in support of NASA's claim of Moon Landings, but whatever I've read sound interesting. Have a read: You can also Listen to this story instead of having to read the whole lot. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...oonshadows.htm Hope you all enjoy this material. There are heaps other site available.. but These were the only two that seem interesting. If I come across any other interesting mateiral, I'll post it here. Have fun. Balraj Singh Last edited by sydneychamp; 07-01-2006 at 12:46 PM.. | |
| | | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Age: 25
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 149 | Re: NASA's Greatest FAKE from what i've heard and the documentries i'm seen on discovery channel... it seems to have been faked! but nothing can be said for sure! i wouldnt hold the "how did the flag stood out flat when there is no air on the moon" against anything to prove whether it was a fake or the truth... but the flag had two poles in it... horizontal and vertical!........ but then again there have been a lot of critiques abt "land" that was borrowed to fake the moon-landing..... everything seems a bit overwhelming | |
| | | |
| | #9 (permalink) | ||
| Pyaar baant te chalo... | Re: NASA's Greatest FAKE
| ||
| | | ||
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| Pyaar baant te chalo... | Re: NASA's Greatest FAKE
| ||
| | | ||
| Advertisements | |
Advertisement | |
| Tags |
| fake, greatest, nasa |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |