| HOME | Forums | Albums | POLLS | FAQ | Calendar | Arcade |
| | |||||||
| DISCUSSIONS Serious thought provoking discussions only |
|
This is a discussion on Did Neil Armstrong land on moon ??? within the DISCUSSIONS forums, part of the Contributions category; Issue 1 Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in ...
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Chandigarh
Posts: 1,618
Thanks: 203
Thanked 361 Times in 219 Posts
Rep Power: 112 | Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, the shadows must be in line. But in this cases, it looks as if there are multiple light sources in moon, which is not possible. The foreground of many images of the astronauts on the Moon are filled in with light, while the shadows remain absolutely black, again proving that there are multiple light sources. There are no stars in the background from pictures taken on the Moon. In some images, a huge light source can be seen reflected in the astronaut's visors. This has to be a very bright, nearby source. There is no possibility of external light source in moon. Issue 5 ![]() How could NASA take TV images of the LM ascending on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 if there was no one on the Lunar surface to man the camera? Issue 6 There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in the 250° temperatures. Any film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature. Issue 7 ![]() The LM engine was very powerful. How come it did not leave a crater below the spacecraft? Why didn't it kick up any dust when it landed? Issue 8 The pictures above show that flags are waving. And they never will. The flag was on the airless Moon, just as we all knew. THERE ARE MANY MORE ISSUES ON THIS, BUT THOSE ARE TOO TECHNICAL FOR US. .....NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON TO LAND ON MOON..... ![]() Last edited by Jagtinder; 17-05-2007 at 04:19 PM.. | |
| | | |
| Thanked by: | TinaCool (17-05-2007) |
| Advertisements | |
Advertisement | |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: chandigarh Age: 23
Posts: 364
Thanks: 6
Thanked 43 Times in 27 Posts
Rep Power: 98 | Re: Did Neil Armstrong land on moon ??? yep i have seen the show on discovery channel and the controversy is still wheather he had ever landed on moon????? or was just made a movie on the earth as landind on a fake moon | |
| | | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Chandigarh
Posts: 1,618
Thanks: 203
Thanked 361 Times in 219 Posts
Rep Power: 112 | Still Not Convinced? The pure oxygen atmosphere in the module would have melted the special video camera covering and produced poisonous gases. Why weren't the astronauts affected? There should have been a substantial crater blasted out under the LM's 10,000 pound thrust rocket. Sceptics(NASA Scientists) would have you believe that the engines only had the power to blow the dust from underneath the LM as it landed. If this is true, how did Armstrong create that famous boot print if all the dust had been blown away? Sceptics claim that you cannot produce a flame in a vacuum because of the lack of oxygen. So how come we have pictures showing a flame coming from the exhaust of an Apollo lander? (Obviously the sceptics are wrong or the footage shows the lander working in an atmosphere). Footprints are the result of weight displacing air or moisture from between particles of dirt, dust, or sand. The astronauts left distinct footprints all over the place. Why did so many NASA Moonscape photos have non parallel shadows? sceptics will tell you because there is two sources of light on the Moon - the Sun and the Earth... That maybe the case, but the shadows would still fall in the same direction, not two or three different angles and Earth shine would have no effect during the bright lunar day (the time at which the Apollo was on the Moon). During the Apollo 14 flag setup ceremony, the flag would not stop fluttering. In 1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer memory was 256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned building. In 2002 a top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of memory to run a simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the memory required to take off again once landed. The alleged computer on board Apollo 11 had 32k of memory. That's the equivalent of a simple calculator. In the year 2005 NASA does not have the technology to land any man, or woman on the Moon, and return them safely to Earth. Moon Landings surely raise doubts...... | |
| | | |
| Thanked by: | TinaCool (17-05-2007) |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: punjab Age: 21
Posts: 164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 62 | Re: Did Neil Armstrong land on moon ??? aaj de time wich kuch wi ho sakda hai chand te hawa bhi sare pagal banate hai | |
| | | |
| Advertisements | |
Advertisement | |
| Tags |
| armstrong, did, land, moon, neil |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ::HOW TERRORISTS BRAIN WASH THE MUSLIM YOUNGSTERS:: | munda_wakhre_type_da | Chit-Chat | 1 | 17-05-2007 10:15 AM |